RetroVision Preview Issue

August, 1997wpe6.jpg (6665 bytes)

RetroVision's first appeared in the form of a special "preview" issue published in August 1997. This limited edition begins with co-editor Ron Magid's cover story on the revolutionary special effects of Jurassic Park, featuring interviews with F/X maestro Stan Winston and the team of ILM magicians.

From there, look for retrospectives on the cult classic horror film, Willard, which stars Bruce Davison as Willard Stiles, the leader of rats; Gene Roddenberry's 1974 pilot The Questor Tapes; a re-examination of Spielberg's 1941, written by Ronald Dale Garmon; a 15th anniversary salute to Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and the most comprehensive piece ever written about Star Trek: Generations, written by editors Edward Gross and Ron Magid and former Sci-Fi Universe editor Mark A. Altman.

 

Rick Berman

Brent Spiner

David Carson

Malcolm MacDowell

Patrick Stewart

William Shatner

The Questor Tapes

 

 

RICK BERMAN

(Producer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RetroVision Preview Issue Excerpts

 

STAR TREK: GENERATIONS

At the time of the release of Star Trek: Generations, certain members of the cast and crew took the time to meet with the press to promote the film. What follows are edited transcripts of those conversations with Great Bird Rick Berman, director David Carson and stars Patrick Stewart, Brent Spiner, Malcolm McDowell and William Shatner. The article appearing in RetroVision is actually told in narrative form and runs a staggering 20,000 words, chronicling all phases of production.

wpe4.jpg (12217 bytes)

 

Q. Were you the one who decided to use Patrick Stewart in the first place?

A. No, but I was partially responsible.

Q. Because I thought that was a brave choice. I mean, here he was a British, classically trained....

A. Actually, when we were casting for Captain Picard, one of my fellow producers, a guy named Bob Justman, had seen Patrick Stewart give a lecture at UCLA and he was very impressed with him. He had also seen him on I, Claudius on PBS. So, he brought him in to meet Roddenberry and Roddenberry's reaction was, "A bald, middle-aged British guy? You've got to be kidding" and he said, "No." This was all before I met these guys. It was a few weeks before I met them. So, then when I came in -- I knew who Patrick was but when I came in, Justman, who had known Roddenberry for years -- he had worked on the original series with him -- said to me, "Once Gene makes a decision, he never changes his mind and don't even think about asking him again to talk about this -- to discuss this English actor." But I was living in this kind of benign ignorance of all that and I had nothing to lose. So, I started bugging Gene about it because we really weren't finding anybody who was close. Justman used to say, "You can't do that. He has made up his mind. You can't do that." But I just kept nudging him and nudging him and finally he agreed to consider Patrick and he changed his mind. So, I didn't discover him but I helped push Gene over to our side.

wpe5.jpg (18529 bytes)

Q. Rick, tell us about the last year for you. Do you sort of feel like you are coming towards the end of the tunnel as Voyager starts production, Deep Space Nine is continuing, you have been through the finale of the first show, then through this film?

A. Every week I always say to myself, this week is going to be a bitch but next week things are really going to lighten up. I said that when we wrapped the film a couple of weeks ago and when we finally locked it, I said, "This is going to be great," but for instance this week we have to lock the pilot on Voyager which we are in our last week of editing on. I've got all these screenings and premieres to go to on this movie and I'm moving this week. In fact, Wednesday, I am going to go to work in the morning, go to the cast and crew screening, which is our first big screening of the film, and then go home to a different house. It has been a busy year, but to me I like to think it is always going to calm down, but it really never does. After this week and after the movie opens, Voyager is in production and Deep Space Nine is in production, we will begin discussions on stories for the next movie. So, it will continue to be busy, I think.

Q. They are already talking a second movie?

 

A. Paramount is talking to me about the second movie. So we are negotiating things and we are already working on some story ideas.

Q. Depending on gross?

A. If nobody goes to see this movie, probably they won't want to do another one. I have a funny feeling that people are going to see this movie.

Q. In terms of Voyager, was it a conscious decision to make the premise different than what had come before?

A. The difference is very important to us. When we developed Voyager, we didn't want to give them a show that was identical to The Next Generation. It's also good for us because as storytellers, it is very hard to just keep doing the same thing. So, we made Deep Space Nine and Voyager different primarily to keep us fresh and hopefully to keep the audience interested.

Q. What do you think is the ongoing appeal of Star Trek?

A. I think there is a few reasons for that -- I'm only answering this kind of quickly because on the television version of this [junket] yesterday, I was asked this question about 45 times so I got my answer down.

Q. Only 48 --

A. No, no. There were 66 actually. Star Trek, I think, foremost is a show that portrays a better future. It gives a sense of hope for the future, which was Roddenberry's whole version of the 23rd and later the 24th century and I think that is something that makes people feel good. I also think that Star Trek is a television show about a family, about a group of people who were good to one another and who are positive, loving people who were off on an adventure, exploring strange new worlds. I also think that Star Trek has become a part of the American culture. You would be hard pressed to find someone who has never heard beaming someone somewhere or warp speed or photon torpedoes or Klingons or any of these things that are a part of Star Trek. I think there is a certain familiarity and comfort in that.

Q. How difficult has it been creating Voyager while also changing the premise in the sense that we're coming home instead of going out there? Did that create a different set of challenges?

A. Yeah, again, we wanted Voyager to be different. So we made it different primarily in three ways. First of all, Gene Roddenberry didn't want conflict amongst his characters. He thought that was a problem which is great, but it doesn't help writing drama because conflict is what drives that. So, we are always trying -- without breaking Gene's rules -- to find ways to put conflict into it. In Deep Space Nine we did it by putting people in uncomfortable environments with others who were not Starfleet people who were constantly giving them aggravation. In Voyager there is a group called the Maquis, which are a group of human freedom fighters or terrorists -- depending on how you look at them -- and we have those but they are well-meaning people in a way. We start our first premiere two-hour episode off with the starship Voyager chasing a bunch of these Maquis. Eventually they both end up on the far side of the galaxy and they end up having to join together because one of the ships is destroyed and these Maquis become Starfeet officers, but there will always be some conflict between them. That gave us something new and unique. Secondly, we have our people 70 years away from home, not necessarily spending their lives getting home, but looking for ways home but while doing it, exploring space. The most unique thing about that is it enables us to no longer be in contact with Starfeet. It's not like we can call home for instructions all the time. We are on our own, which is another thing. The final thing was that we put a woman at the helm, which was something that we thought it was time to do and gives the show a slightly different edge.

Q. The quote "Time is the fire in which we burn" worked out very well in the movie, I thought.

A. When we were developing a story about people obsessed with time and people obsessed with their own mortality, we pulled out a lot of quotes and a lot of things that seemed to be relevant to the story. This Delmore Schwartz quote kind of hit it right on the head. One of the actors, I'm not sure which, kept insisting that that quote was from Shakespeare. I remember going back and saying, "It's Delmore Schwartz" and everybody thought I was kidding.

Q. This film to me appears to be particularly lush and lavish in its production, the lighting and cinematography and special effects, it seems to me to be about the best of the entire movie series in terms of production, and I wanted to know if you could talk about that. The choice of ILM and conceptualizing the special effects.

A. Well, one of the benefits we have had by doing this television series for so many years is having put together a team of remarkable people. Our visual effects teams, who have been working with us for nearly eight years, now are among the best there are. We don't have a facility like ILM does in Northern California, but we have terrific people who are always on the cutting edge of having to go about doing this stuff. That is always because on television you never have the budget to do it properly, so you always have to find new ways of doing it so you can get it done. So, we were in the position to be able to use those people. We have used ILM before. ILM is one of a number of places that bid on this job that ended up getting it, and we worked very closely with them for the last year and a half on all of the opticals. There are over 200 opticals in this movie, which is a lot. The optical budget on this film -- although I'm not supposed to tell you what it is -- is higher than any of the other Star Trek movies. Part of it is like the old Avis thing, you know, we try harder. Being involved in television, we spend our lives fighting time and fighting budgets to do things in a small way which, of course, we do, always dreaming and wishing that we could do things properly. This was our opportunity to do things properly. John Alonzo was our cinematographer, who was terrific; and David Carsen had a vision that we worked on very carefully to be sure we all agreed on what the movie was going to look like.

Q. Is Whoopi Goldberg going to be involved in future projects?

A. You mean beyond this movie?

Q. Yes.

A. Well, she is terrific in this film and I'm sure that she will be --

Q. Did she ask not to be credited?

A. Yes, she did, which I think is somewhat common when big stars have smaller roles in films.

Q. There seems to have been so many stories in the press and they were attacking you, attacking the movie, attacking Voyager on a weekly basis. It feels like one of those situations where Star Trek has reached this level now, let's try to knock it down. Did you feel that way at all?

A. Yeah, a little bit. There were always rumors. We lived with rumors for years with the television show because Star Trek is so popular and it means so much to so many people. They are so passionate about it, you get gossip and you get rumors, but it wasn't until we made a movie that things were getting printed in national magazines. There were stories printed about the test screenings that we had that were totally false, just made up by somebody! There were stories about this Genevieve Bujold thing which were just 100% false. Not even somebody misinterpreting something. I was just envisioning 16 year old disgruntled kids who for some reason didn't get an autograph or something like that, sitting down on the Internet at 3:00 in the morning, typing out some kind of a story and the next day it is in a national newspaper. It's kind of scary, but we have had a love/hate relationship with Entertainment Weekly. They do incredible things -- very, very favorable things and then they will write an article and very often they will take these things and they will base them on totally incorrect hearsay. The greatest thing is we traced this. You have a 15 year old who writes something on the Internet and the next day it is in a tabloid, but then Entertainment Weekly will have read it in the tabloid and then all of a sudden a major newspaper will say that we read it in Entertainment Weekly. All of a sudden you have read something in five different sources that was all totally uncorroborated nonsense that was just some disgruntled person making something up. That was frustrating for us, but there has been a lot more good publicity that we have had than bad.

Q. How did you originally get involved in Star Trek and did you know what you were getting into at the time?

A. No, I certainly didn't know what I was getting into at the time. I was a producer of films and television and a writer here in New York. I moved to California in 1984 and I ended up working as a Development Executive for Paramount Pictures. I was made a Vice President in less than two years of being in LA and one day somebody decided that they were going to do a new Star Trek television series. I was the lowest man on the totem pole, I was the lowest vice president and I think they figured that Roddenberry was known as being such a pain in the ass they would give this one to me. "Go over there to Building B, you can have him." So, I went and developed a wonderful rapport with Gene. I had done a lot of travelling because I had worked with the United Nations on making films for them, and I sat down and had lunch with Gene one day and we had a lot in common. For two people who had nothing in common, we had a lot in common. The next day I got a phone call from his lawyer -- who was also like his personal manager -- who asked to have lunch with me. So, it was like two lunches in a row. This is going to be fun and he said we would like you to leave your job as Paramount Vice President. We would like you to come work for us on the show. So, this all happened in two days. It was risky for me because this was a syndicated television show, which one hour dramatic shows were unheard of as being successful; which was science fiction which at that point was something that nobody was really embracing, and it was a sequel. It was three strikes against me to start. So, I thought about it for about three minutes and said, yes, because I didn't enjoy being a studio executive. I wanted to go back to producing and I started working with Gene and after about the first year, he got the show steered in the right direction and trusted me and had confidence that I was not going to try to fix Star Trek. He was constantly running into people who wanted to fix Star Trek. He was confident that I was going to try and keep his vision relatively clear. So, he stepped back kind of quickly because he was not feeling too well at that point. It is very difficult producing episodic television. It is very long hours. He sort of gave it to me.

Q. Is it true that Roddenberry's ashes were brought into space aboard one of the space shuttles?

A. I think, in fact, they weren't scattered, they were brought up and it was a tiny little pinch of them and it was something that was done on the slide because I don't think you are supposed to do that. But one of the astronauts who knew Gene, I believe, took a tiny little bit up on one of the shuttle trips and gave it back to Majel [Barrett Roddenberry], or at least that is what I was told.

Q. Majel has been involved in all the versions of Star Trek. Did you use her in the film?

A. Yeah. We didn't want to do it without her, so there is a sequence when -- right before the saucer separates, when everybody is evacuating the ship, you hear the computer and that is Majel.

Q. A lot of the cast members seemed to not have much to do. Obviously you have to get the Captain stories in and you can only get so many people involved, but Spot the cat has more screen time than many of the cast does You had to make those decisions, but these are people that you worked with for seven years. In the day to day series, you can say, "Okay, you're not in this episode, but you'll be in the next one." Is that the same thing here -- "You won't be in this movie, but you'll be in the next one." How do deal with the egos and certain feelings and people coming to you begging for more? Begging to get on Deep Space Nine or Voyager?

A. Spot, the cat gave me a lot of trouble. We have the unique situation in that this was a movie that had fifteen roles in it that had already been cast before we wrote the movie. You are not dealing with actors who read for a role and get it and they are happy. You have actors who have the role already, who feel they know more about the character than you do, and who undoubtedly will feel underpaid and underused and so that is something you've got to deal with very sensitively. We have seven characters from The Next Generation, Whoopi is eight, three characters from the original series. That is eleven and a couple of others. You've got like 15 characters. So the question becomes -- you can't have 15 stars in the movie and as this story evolved, we ended up with Kirk and Picard and Data having the three major arcs in this film and Soran, the guest star, our villain. So, what you try to do is you try to create minor storylines or scenes that the other actors will have that will showcase them to some degree. It is frustrating. It is frustrating for the actors and sometimes those things will be minimized in the cutting room, not because that is the way it was planned, but because when you are pasting the movie in the cutting room and you've got to lose things and shorten things, you end up bringing things down. LeVar had a wonderful scene that was dramatically short, not because of LeVar but because of the pasting of the movie. I think if you look at the original Star Trek movies, you will see numerous films where a number of the actors had small parts. It is part of the game. When you have an ensemble in any one given movie, it is going to just feature certain people and there were hurt feelings, but I worked diligently with every one of our actors on their parts, because these people know these characters very well. They played them for over seven years and we worked with them and everybody had notes. Especially with Patrick, Brent and Bill, we made a lot of changes and we made a lot of accommodations and they helped. They made it better.

Q. I think some of us are wondering why some of the original series cast members appeared and some of the others didn't.

A. That's very simple. When we developed this story, originally we just wanted to introduce the original cast in a prologue in the beginning of the movie, kind of a farewell for these guys and then when we started developing the story, we realized there was a way to bring Kirk back into it and that he could have an arc that would remain at the end, and that was the script that we wrote. So, when we brought it to Leonard and when we brought it to DeForest Kelley, they both looked at it and they had what amounted to elaborate cameos. I don't think they even had ten lines in the picture and for them they felt that they had said the proper good-bye in Star Trek VI, a film that was designed to be the last Star Trek movie. If you recall, if you saw that movie, it ended with each one of their signatures, the actor's name appearing on the screen saying good-bye. For DeForest Kelley and for Leonard I think the feeling was that they had left the Star Trek series of films in the proper fashion and they didn't want to come back to do it in a short piece. With Shatner it was different because he had a role that he really thought would be a challenge to him and would be a lot of fun.

Q. Are there plans to bring either the original cast or The Next Generation cast on to Deep Space Nine?

A. We are always playing around with those things and we have done that over the years. DeForest Kelley, Scotty and Spock have been on The Next Generation, so we have managed to do that. Whether it continues, we'll have to wait and see.

Q. In regards to the reshooting of the ending, Malcolm McDowell said that as they shot it originally, they knew it was anticlimactic in a sense. That shooting Kirk in the back wasn't exciting enough for all that had come before in the movie. Was that part of the reason for the reshoot -- that it just wasn't an exciting ending for an exciting movie?

A. I don't think that we knew it was anticlimactic. We knew that we had less time to do it. This was at the very end of the shoot and we were running out of time -- that's what the movie is about, right? And we didn't have the time to do it properly. When we came back and screened the film for a test audience, we had a wonderful reception to the movie, but the test audience -- and more importantly -- all of us saw six and a half minutes of the film -- the stuff that you guys saw that is on the bridge -- that we felt was not as exciting as it could be and we were blessed in that Paramount said to us, "If you want to go back and redo it, go back and redo it." So, there was a part of us that kept saying we have to go back to that dreadful mountain in Nevada, but we did. We went back and reshot that six and a half minutes and we made it better. You know, again you were talking about the press and gossip and things -- I read incredible things. I read that we had terrible reports [from the screening], which was completely incorrect. It was one of the highest testing first-tested movies that Paramount had ever done. I read we were doing it to alter Kirk's fate -- to make Kirk's fate more ambiguous. Totally incorrect things that somebody just makes up and all of a sudden the next day you read about it on the front page of the entertainment section. We went back because there was this six and a half minute segment that we wanted to punch up and make a little bit more exciting.

Q. Didn't Paramount do the same thing with Fatal Attraction? It was a great movie with a weak ending in which they said let's reshoot and it turned it into a $300 million movie?

A. Well, in the test screening we sensed that this six and half minutes I am talking about didn't get the same amount of enthusiasm, but to me this is an example in favor of the testing procedure. We tested the movie. It got a wonderful response. There was one area that seemed a little disappointing -- not disappointing -- a little disappointing, and we went back and fixed it, which kinds of shows the persistence --

Q. You don't have that luxury in Star Trek V. Paramount didn't like the movie so it just kind of threw it out there to fend for itself.

A. So, it ended up working out for the best. Clear and Present Danger is a very big movie -- it is one of the top grossing movies of the year. They went back to Mexico to reshoot a bunch of scenes. You don't read about it in the paper because it is a normal process.

Q. In Star Trek II Spock was dead but he wasn't dead. Is Kirk really dead?

A. Is Kirk really dead?

Q. I mean, he is dead, but --

A. He is not here today.

Q. Will you swear that there is no possible way he will ever come back?

A. No, I will not.

Q. What are you striving for?

A. That's like saying, beyond your work and your leisure time, what is your future? Right now we are continuing with Deep Space Nine and Voyager. Voyager, I think, is going to be really terrific. We put together a remarkable cast and it's going really, really well. We are shooting our fourth episode right now. We are in discussions about the next movie and that's plenty for me. In the television business, people work under this horrible spectra of never knowing if you are going to get cancelled tomorrow. If you have a full year commitment, it is considered a relaxed state. We have television shows that we know are going to run for many years. I've got a movie opening this week that I'm pretty secure is going to do very well, and we are going to start developing another one. So, as far as the future is concerned, I would love to take a few days off. I've been working a lot of weekends.

 

 

DAVID CARSON

(Director)

 

 

 

Rick Berman

Brent Spiner

David Carson

Malcolm MacDowell

Patrick Stewart

William Shatner

The Questor Tapes

 

Q. Why did you cut the scene with Malcolm McDowell torturing LeVar Burton?

wpe8.jpg (4170 bytes)

A. The thing about this scene was that basically in the scheme of things when we put the movie together, it was too long. It said what it needed to say three times in slightly different ways and it said it in the center of the film, where you needed to be moving more swiftly than we were able to. So, what we decided to do in the end is not go into a great torture scene with Geordi screaming and yelling and things all happening and people pressing things and touching his heart and stuff like that, but to give the impression that this extremely evil man is now going to torture him and make him feel extraordinary unhappy and uncomfortable, which is what we ended up with. The scene repeated its theme as interrogation scenes often do. "Now, I want you to tell me what Captain Picard knows about Thilithium." "I'm not going to tell you." "Well, I want you to tell me." "I'm not going to tell." "Well, I'm going to torture you." "I'm still not going to tell you." "Well, I still want you to tell me."

Q. Can't you tell that from the script initially?

A. No, sometimes you can't tell these things from the script. That scene itself contains some of the basis of Malcolm's character and one of the tragedies about cutting the end of the scene was that we lost some of the detail of his character. This is how movies get made. You cannot possibly tell sometimes unless you are an incredible genius, and even then they tend to reshoot just as much as anybody else does -- you can't tell how the structure of your movie physically is going to work out differently from on the page.

Q. What was it like working with William Shatner?

 

A. You mean playing Captain Kirk?

Q. No -- yeah, either way.

A. Well, let me talk about him playing Captain Kirk. As a man, from what little I know of him, he is a multi-faceted, multi-talented individual. He has his hands in so many different piles, not all entertainment. I mean he has achievements in dealing with horses and things like that which seem to be quite remarkable for somebody who doesn't know very much about horses. So, he seems to be a multi-talented individual. However, when he walks onto the bridge of the Enterprise with his costume on and his makeup on, he is Captain Kirk. He brings with him the remarkable legacy. He is Captain Kirk and he doesn't walk onto the set and fool about -- I don't mean fool about like other actors do but have a good time as Bill Shatner. He walks onto the set and he is Captain Kirk and the eyes and the cameras follow him and the people have grown up with the legend of Star Trek react when he walks on. I mean, they really do because here they are on the Enterprise-B. They have never been on it before and he is Captain Kirk. Here is the power and strength of this incredible legend. He is an icon of American mythology. He is a hero but he happens to be walking about amongst us when he puts that uniform on. As an actor, he is the most wonderfully talented and imaginative actor -- full of ideas, always wanting to contribute and join in and discuss and elaborate and fully round out what he is doing. Very willing to experiment and try different things even though his character -- which he has created, of course -- has not done such things before. Very interested in expanding his view of Captain Kirk. As you can see, I like him a lot and got on with him very well. It was really a pleasure working with him.

wpeC.jpg (15522 bytes)

Q. Tell me about the difference in directing between Stewart and Shatner, just in the fact that you were familiar with one and not the other, and also whether or not it changed your directing of Patrick working with him on film as opposed to the series.

A. One of the director's jobs is to create the atmosphere on the set for the actors to do their best work. In most stories, the performance is paramount. Everybody talks about the special effects and stuff like that in Star Trek. Star Trek is a relationship-oriented piece of entertainment. Those are the most important things. So, therefore, we can have many special effects -- and we have 220 of them in the movie -- but without these performances and without the seriousness in which the performances relate to the themes, we are sunk. Now, my inclination is always to treat each actor totally differently. I attempt to talk to them in their language. Find out what their language is. Certainly I don't talk to Bill Shatner in an American accent, but I try to tune in to what he is doing so I can swiftly communicate with him. So, the difference between working with Patrick and Bill, is that I have a shorthand with Patrick. We worked together. We understand each other. I can communicate with him in ways that are invariably much shorter, crisper and we understand each other and lock on and he talks back to me. We have a shorthand and that grows with your acquaintance with an actor. With Bill we immediately locked on well together. We understood each other, but things just take that little bit longer. These are tiny, tiny things with dealing with an actor. Some actors love conflict. Some creators like to create the conflict. Actors are no different from anybody like that. These two actors were basically professionals who seemed to long to work with each other. When they came onto the set, they were just a delight. They were full of ideas. They were ready to work. They exchanged ideas between themselves and me and we had a great time. We had none of the anticipated furor or egos and stuff like that.

Q. Obviously the two characters have opposite personalities....

A. Well, in a way Picard and Kirk -- although they are totally separate -- are like two sides of the same coin. They complement and although they overlap in their various skills and areas, the twinkle with which Bill Shatner does everything-- that Kirk does everything -- and the seriousness in which Picard does everything are sort of like opposites that attract. I mean Kirk with gay abundance leaps into the prey with a twinkle in his eyes and quip on his lips which, if you like, is an old-fashioned heroic way of doing things. Picard enters things seriously and perhaps with the same sort of excitement and twinkle in his eye, but there is no usual quip on the lips. He is dealing with things very, very strongly. What we did in the movie when we dealt with the Enterprise-B and the Enterprise-D, was we tried to treat the Enterprise-B and the people in it as if we were dealing with a period; we were consciously doing a film that was 100 years older than the other one and we tried to light it differently and use our cameras slightly differently and it seems to have worked because people have commented to me that it was slightly more old-fashioned than the Enterprise-D. We tried to make a difference between them, but, in fact, when you put Kirk and Picard together in the same setting at the same time, the main difference is one of fashion. The kind of trousers that Kirk wears as opposed to what Picard wears, but I don't see a difference in here is a 60's style and a 90's style. Here is a hero from that particular era and here is a hero from this particular era.

Q. Was it difficult to direct the scene where Kirk dies?

A. It wasn't difficult, no. The difficult thing about it or the challenging thing about it is not that he dies but how he dies. And the expectations of everybody who has been with him in his various mythical exploits over the last 30 years, have about the death of a hero. The hero dies and he has to die correctly. That was the most challenging thing to work out. I think, for example, a part of the mythology has been when Kirk dies, he dies alone. In this movie he died alone, but because this is about handing of the torch, obviously when he dies, he passes the torch in many ways. His mortality, which is what the film is about, comes into the new generation, the next generation. So, he had to die with Picard and one of the differences we made between the ending that we created to start with and then the change that we made, was that I tried to create this barrier around Kirk so that Picard could not get at him and he couldn't touch him. He was under all this incredible amount of metal which was tangled and he was inside. So, I started in a way where you see Picard coming down and you see this thing in a distance and then you see him for a long time looking through the metal and see what the damage is and he doesn't see Kirk. We reveal Kirk right at the end when Picard comes to look at him and you see the distance between them and the two men are incredibly well separated. So, we tried to be truthful to those things and yet looked at our own needs. I think with the performance that Bill gave and that we worked on for that week, it was a very delicate and moving performance.

Q. But, in fact, you did reshoot it based on audience response?

A. We reshot it because we wanted to -- having seen it much in the same vein that I was talking about earlier. I mean, what an amazing thing to be able to do. Do it better and bigger and, yeah, this is a wonderful film is what they said but the interesting thing about the two endings -- and I don't believe it is any secret because I understand that you can get the first script from somewhere and look at it on the Internet -- was that the same basic ideas that we used in the first version are in the second version. In other words, that Captain Kirk gives his life for 230 million people. He saves the situation like that. He dies trying to save the universe and he dies with Captain Picard. He uses his strength and his ability to leap into battle with a smile on his lips and all that sort of thing to physically attack and deal with Soran, who we have seen already in the film, Picard can't deal with. He is head-butted down a levine. So, when he comes back, he needs Kirk's physical skills and his ability to deal with things physically while Picard goes and deals with the launcher. But throughout the film we had moving scenes of highs and lows, and the simplicity of this ending was governed by this 50 day schedule that we had to deal with. I mean we had to bring it in in 50 days in order to keep the budget down so we could do this huge effort. The only way we could get away with doing this effort and not spend $100 million was to do it quickly and do it in 50 days. So, we had to make some simplicity work on our side, but to make a long story short, when we got to the end and discovered that we had these huge calamities in our ending which was satisfactory and was good and true and was simple, it wasn't satisfying enough. It didn't go that whole way to satisfy. So, we went as the film makers to Sherry Lansing and said we are very anxious about the ending. We would like to do more. We know from Casablanca endings have been reshot, so it is nothing new and I thought that perhaps with a bit of luck they would let me have the actors and bits of metal and we could get on a building on top of Paramount somewhere and do it and I would get a day to shoot it if I was lucky. I thought I could change it enough to make it more powerful and stronger, but when Sherry saw the film, she looked at it and said, "This is a wonderful film. Let's go for the ending. Let's go and expand it and get the guys together more." So, what we did though was instead of having Kirk nose to nose constantly to Soran, which is how the first one was, we put him in a different sort of physical danger which was the bridge and the danger was created by Soran but he then had to leap to the bridge. So, we just changed it and expanded it. But we didn't throw one ending away and rewrite it. As I said before, what an incredibly fortunate thing to have happened to us.

Q. Why didn't Whoopi Goldberg take credit on this film?

A. Rick would probably know more about this than I do, but I believe it was her request that she should be not used as the mega star in this. She says in her one woman shows it is her attachment to Star Trek and her belief in Star Trek from when she was a child that made her want to be in it and she asked for a role to be written in this film for her but she doesn't want to appear above the title as a Whoopi Goldberg movie. I remember a very famous episode called "Yesterday's Enterprise" and that came about because I was scheduled to do an episode and I didn't know which one it was. Suddenly Whoopi was free and they said, "Quick, get Whoopi over here." They didn't have a script. So, there we were with seven days to start shooting with no script, but we did have Whoopi, because whenever she becomes free and she is able to give us a day or two, she generously does that because she wants to be a part of it. She feels it is important to her life so I can understand her saying -- and I think it is fair too -- that she not be used as this juggernaut, which she is, to sell a movie.

wpeD.jpg (13305 bytes)

Q. Why weren't some of the other people from the original show cast?

A. Because only two people were written to be with Captain Kirk. George Takei in a way was in the show. Sulu's daughter was in it, which I thought was a wonderful, wonderful way of continuing the generations and speaking about mortality. See, it was more important for us I think to deal with our theme, which is about mortality, the handing on of torches, the passing from generation to generation. To have a child of one of the originals on board the ship, actually I think makes a greater point than producing everybody from the last series and indeed as the publicity says, it is a story about two captains and the passing of the torch from one generation to another. But to have the entire old cast makes it become a little bit like a boy's club or all girl's club instead of telling the story. We wanted to have a point. It wasn't just a lark and romp in space. I mean, very deliberately another one of the scenes that we cut from the movie that I think everybody now knows about is a scene which starts with Bill parachuting out of orbital skydiving into a hay field and landing undignified and Scotty running along behind him. "What are you doing? You are too old to be doing this sort of thing" which is very much like how some of the old movies started, you know. It started with a joke and all of that and as I said to Bill, the point about this movie is not that you are going off to do deeds of daring for two hours or so, therefore, it will be good to have a scene where you are shown as a human being and it is funny and it is sort of interesting. In this movie, the first time you see Captain Kirk, he is Captain Kirk. He is a hero. He is the folkloric figure because it is his movement to that inclination to his death and the passing from one generation to another, but it is important in the story. So, that is why we decided to set it up as we did. We wanted Captain Kirk and we wanted to suggest the rest of the generation by having two of his officers with him. There was some argument about who they were going to be, but that is why we came to that decision.

 

PATRICK STEWART

(Captain Jean Luc Picard)

 

 

 

 

Rick Berman

Brent Spiner

David Carson

Malcolm MacDowell

Patrick Stewart

William Shatner

The Questor Tapes

wpe2.jpg (10010 bytes)

 

Q. Is this the most massive press event you have been around?

A. Oh, yes. I've never done this before. I'm a virgin and yesterday was one of the most curious days of my life. We were doing broadcast interviews and I think it was very tough -- tough on the interviewers too, I think.

Q. You have done some courageous things in your career. Leaving the RSC and coming to the U.S. What was the toughest thing you ever did?

A. Taking this job I used up every single minute of the five days that Paramount gave me to make up my mind about the TV series -- not the movie. I didn't have many doubts about the movie, but in 1987 for the first time in quite a number of years, I felt that my career was moving in a way that I could hardly control. I liked what was happening to me. I liked the work that was coming in. I had been achieving a certain amount of success in areas that were new to me and I was looking forward to the end of the 80's, spending my life mostly on the stage. In fact, I was in the middle of a very successful production of Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf. I think I made the right choice, but it was very, very difficult and I went right to the wire in making the decision. The last couple of days I talked with many people and asked them what I should do and the last person I went to see was the screenwriter/director Tom Ritman. I said, "Tell me what to do. I don't know what I should do about this job." He said, "I think you should come to America. I think you should work in Hollywood for a period of time. All the other work will still be there when you are done. It won't go away and I think you should come to the United States and have a lot of fun." I wasn't to know it then, but of course, fun was the one thing that was to characterize the next seven years because I was to laugh more in the next seven years than I had in the previous 45.

Q. So, you don't regret the decision?

A. No. There would be nothing that I would change. Even now looking back on seven years on the series, if I had known it would have been seven years, I would not have signed up. It was just too big of a chunk out of my life. We used to sit around and play games -- Brent, Jonathan, all of us projecting how long it would run and we would settle between two to three years maximum. Oh, it shows how naive you are.

Q. So, you actually did sign a seven year contract?

A. No, I signed a six year contract. I was so innocent, I didn't realize that if I agreed to do the pilot, I was in effect signing a six year contract. That's the way it is for a TV series. When actors go to network, you are making a commitment and it is very much a one-sided commitment too. No, I would not have accepted the offer, but now that I can see it from this point of view now, seven years later, everything worked out just fine.

Q. Was it harder working on the stage?

A. The only time in my life that I have worked harder than in the seven years of The Next Generation series was when I was seventeen and I worked for a building contractor who, feeling that I needed to be built up, used to insist that I mixed cement by hand. There was no other job that has taxed me physically than The Next Generation did. Largely because of the nature of my role, I was there for long days -- 14, 15, 16, 17 or 18 hours. Although as a director I hold the record for the longest day on the set, but that was the day I was a director and not an actor.

Q. How long?

A. The crew call was at 7:00 a.m. and I wrapped at 2:35 in the morning.

Q. Would you have been willing to do a couple more?

A. No.

Q. Some people say that you were one of the main reasons the series was cancelled.

A. So, I am told. I am flattered by those remarks, that people should think that I have that much power. In fact, Paramount and I had an open arrangement for an eighth season and this time the option was on both sides, which is a little unusual. As it happened, the studio pulled the show. I was never consulted and I feel their timing was perfect. I liked the idea that we would end the series when we were on top and the very final episode that we did was one of the best that we had done in the whole show. Everyone was ready. I started to fear that I as an actor might start repeating myself. Days were not as interesting and as exciting as they had been and I was looking for fresh fields and pastures new. I wish we had not had to go into the movie quite so quickly as we did. We had four days off -- I had four days off between wrapping the series and stepping on board the Lady Washington in Santa Monica Bay. Luckily I did not have to do too much character research before we went.

Q. How would you say the characters of Picard and Kirk are different from each other?

A. Well, I don't know what it feels like to be Captain Kirk. I know what it feels like to be Captain Picard. In many respects it is the very same view to be Patrick Stewart, because the edges have become somewhat blurred now. Where one leaves off and the other one begins, I don't know. Over the years a lot of what I believe, what interests me, a lot of what gets my attention has gone into Jean Luc Picard and a certain amount of him has hopefully rubbed off on me. Perhaps, in essence, the differences would seem to be pretty clear. Picard is essentially a negotiator, a talker, a diplomat, and Kirk is very much a man of action. He would throw a punch first and ask questions afterwards.

Q. There's that moment when Kirk says to Picard "I thought you were going to get the missile," and you said, "Oh, I've changed my mind," like you want to have in on the fun. Sort of more hands-on.

A. That's right. I changed my mind. Captain's Perogative. It is as though there is a little of Captain Kirk rubbing off in that moment. There were more jokes which are no longer in the movie. I'm sad about that, but there were some other elements of humor and ironic comments and so forth. Some little puns largely to do with play on the word bridge. I think at the time it was probably not a place to be ironic. I'm told that the cinema audiences cheer when he says, "Don't you talk to me like that. I was saving the galaxy when your grandfather was still in diapers." It's a funny line and, of course, it reverberates in a multitude of different ways, too, because it's not only Kirk speaking to Picard but it is the actor Bill Shatner speaking to Patrick Stewart. I thought that was charming.

Q. How did that feel when the two of you were working together? Obviously there were various reports about conflicts, but the fact is on the series you were clearly in charge -- the man -- the central figure -- the captain. Here you are in almost some ways a co-equal, maybe even, some would argue, slightly lesser than Kirk. How does that feel?

A. It felt absolutely incredible. I'm very, very satisfied with how it has turned out in the movie. I had been the most passionate voice for this being a truly transitional movie. Three years ago when rumors of a feature film was first floating around, I said this film must include as many members of the original crew as possible. Find some way of bringing all of us together. Not only would I feel it would be missing a simply unique filming opportunity to have the two crews side by side -- and I do regret it's not the entire original cast, but wouldn't it have been wonderful to have one scene and have both crews together in the same room? Well, of course, it is Star Trek and that may still happen because anything can happen on Star Trek. When it became a reality that there would be a role for Bill and originally, of course, Spock was written into the movie and Bones -- they were all there -- I was so anxious that Bill should find the role interesting and that he should want to do it. It would have been a bitter disappointment if he had pulled out. But once we got working together and I began to tune in on to just how Bill plays this guy, I thought we had the making of a really nice team. The now infamous reshoot, about which there was a great deal of gossip and not because the film tested badly. On the contrary, it tested wonderfully well, but at the moment when Bill says, "It sounds like fun" and we gallop off to leave the Nexus, when we arrived down at the planet, basically I said, "Okay, Captain, you go this way and I'll go that way" and we split up. Whereas, that's not what the fans wanted to see. They wanted to see the two captains shoulder to shoulder. That was the whole purpose of bringing them together and that's not how it was. So the reshoot was a very sensible action. I think it could have been even more of that buddy quality in the last part of the movie.

Q. Does the association of Star Trek bother you one way or the other?

A. It bothered me in anticipation. A lot. I spent a large part of the last four years working really hard to create for myself a career and identity that was apart from Captain Picard. For that reason I have spent Christmas for the last five years running my show [A Christmas Carol], which is coming back to Broadway. I wanted to let people know that I was a stage actor and I have a stage history. The kind of roles that I have had and the opportunities to accept have been few because Star Trek eats up so much of the year, but my role of the maitre'd from hell and the monstrous drug barren, and doing things like The MGM Story for Turner was a very important step, and then I did an action movie with Pierce Brosnan. All of this was very calculated because I did have genuine fears that the role might become an albatross around my neck. I hope I have a lot of working life ahead of me and I didn't want to find a handicap. So far as I can see, it has on the contrary opened up all kinds interesting and exciting possibilities for me. This summer I was in New York filming a stage play, Jeffrey, in which I played the middle-aged gay lover of a young man who was a dancer and HIV positive. It was simply a grand experience not only because the script was truly brilliant, but it gave me the opportunity to play a character who was just about as different from Picard as you could find; an outrageous, ironic flamboyant individual who believed the best way to deal with AIDS was to laugh at it but who has a tragic story because, of course, his lover dies at the end of the movie. Right now I am shooting a movie called Let it Be Me, which is a romantic comedy set in a world of a ballroom dancing studio and I play a New York dancing coach who is a bit of a hustler as far as the women are concerned. I had the thrilling experience of not only acting with but also dancing with Leslie Carol, who is my partner. Four days ago she and I literally danced down 54th Street to the soundtrack of Frank Sinatra. I thought that that was probably a good moment to end my career. I didn't think it could get much better than that and, in fact, Leslie and I spent the whole Thursday and Friday dancing and the movie ends with our marriage, dancing the wedding waltz to Bing Crosby singing "True Love."

Q. Did you have much training for that?

A. I did. I came back to New York for almost two weeks of ballroom dance training and one of the nicest things about this movie is that people are paying me money to come in and learn to ballroom dance, and to spend my days with beautiful women in my arms. So, we foxtrot and quick step and I do a pretty smooth Waltz and my Tango is something to be seen. I do the Mambo, I have Cha-Cha steps. I even have a few little tap steps that I do with Elliot Gould.

Q. Like Dirty Dancing.

A. Of course, the film is written and directed by Eleanor Bernstein who wrote Dirty Dancing. So there is a certain amount of that in the movie too. In our wedding party there are some hip-hop dancers and there is also a guy who does break-dancing too, and it's spectacular.

Q. When you were that 17 year old kid mixing concrete, what was the dream like and how is the reality different from that dream?

A. I never permitted myself dreams that would have encompassed the reality of today. When I was mixing cement, my dreams were exclusively fixed on being a Sheakespearean stage actor and it was all I wanted to be. Finally, in 1966, I was accepted into the Royal Shakespeare Company. I felt that there was nowhere else I would ever want to go. I was about as happy as I could possibly be and right at the end of that first season, they offered me a three year contract to stay on -- I can picture right now the phone booth where I called my wife and said, "It has happened. I am just going to stay here forever." But that it should ever segue into an American TV series was something that I could not have imagined and there is nothing about it -- not a single day -- that I would have changed. I feel myself extraordinary blessed.

Q. Now, to kind of quote Malcolm McDowell and paraphrase, he said the RSC was not his cup of tea when he was there, but he was there with you for a year or so?

A. For one year, my very first season in 1966. Malcolm was a spear-holder and I do mean a spear-holder. He did not have a line to speak. Well, that is the reality. I, on the other hand, did have a handful of lines and I also had some understudy but largely I was there to understudy the lead actors. I didn't know Malcolm too well in those days.

Q. Shakespeare has been a big part of your life. Do you have any advice to young people who are totally turned off by it?

A. Well, if they are totally turned off by it, I certainly wouldn't want to urge it on them, but if someone has to spend some time with Shakespeare, I would want them to try to believe that there is no one key that will unlock its appeal, no one answer, no one solution. One of the reasons Shakespeare and his works have survived over 400 years is because he has a multitude of ideas he deals with and if one child could connect with Shakespeare in some way, no matter how absurd it might seem, it is valid. It is his connection and that is his way into Shakespeare. Whatever it might happen to be. What a teacher has to do is find a way in for the child and once that door has been opened, then it will continue to open wider and wider.

Q. Rumors and Star Trek really seem to go together a lot. I was wondering what do you think of the whole process of constantly having every thing you say dissected, truthful or not, and in particular one question about the rumor that on the set of the show you were very particular about the Captain's chair and that it was not to be sat in by anybody but you. Is that true?

A. Yes, it is true and I kind of blush to recall that. All of that belongs to my pre-Americanization days. I really do believe I was something of a pompous asshole when I first started and I was fortunate enough to work with a group of people who I think liked me enough to not want me to go on being a pompous asshole. Most notably among them, Jonathan Frakes, and it is true. I did make a fuss in the beginning that nobody should be allowed to sit in the chair -- I mean nobody, under any circumstances whatsoever and I got incensed at times when they would write in scenes that somebody would sit in the chair, "Okay, okay. Number One can have the bridge, but he stays in his own chair." Anyway, I hope happily all of those uncomfortable days are behind me. I do remember calling a company meeting -- they will all remember this -- somewhere during the first season and Denise Crosby was still on the show in those days. I felt that the set was much too undisciplined and that we should all exhibit more self-control and so -- I mean could you imagine? I'm talking like that to other actors. What was I thinking? I remember Denise saying, "Come on, Patrick. You know, it is just fun" and I said, "We are not here to have fun!" Well, as it proved I happened to have just about the funniest time that I have had in my life for the last five or six years on the show. Like I said, that's all part of my Americanization.

Q. What broke the dam? What unleashed --

A. They wore me down. They wouldn't do the things I wanted them to do and they just laughed and made fun of me. Finally, I realized that it was all together much more comfortable just enjoying them and I would like to think that I actually became one of the most rowdiest, most disruptive characters on the show before the series was over.

Q. What about you getting dissected by the fans and media? Did you ever feel like saying to the fans, "Get a life?"

A. No, I never felt that. That has never been my view of the fans. Sometimes I think they are a little overly obsessed with the series and I cannot get that obsessed with it. Like when people say to me, "Mr. Stewart, can you tell me exactly how fast is warp speed?" I say, "You couldn't get on the freeway" and I don't pour over the details where many of them do. It was for me at the beginning a job, although a job I took too seriously and I think that one of the strengths of the series finally was that all of us worked very hard but insisted on being as lighthearted as possible for as much of the time as possible. I think that became something infectious that passed through the group and I can see it in the movie, although some of my colleagues were disappointed to find that they didn't have more to do in the movie. And I was disappointed for them. Every single one of the people that I worked with are certainly fine actors and any one of them could lead one of the films. They have done it time and time again in the series. I was saying this to one of them the other night. It doesn't amount to the length of screen time that you get, but the quality of the screen time and every single moment one of my colleagues were on screen, was absolutely tremendous. There is a wonderful moment when Gates is seen through Geordi's visor and she was bending over him. If you have ever seen a more beautiful image than that on the screen, I can't image where it is. It was just dazzling how Gates looks in that film. I think it is because of this continual feeling of good fellowship that we had on the show, that the cast was just as substantial as it really is.

Q. Are you still married and do you have children?

A. No, I am no longer married, but I do still have children. I have a son and a daughter. My son is an actor and my daughter is in the process of becoming an independent businesswoman.

Q. How do you feel about one of your children being an actor?

A. I was very uneasy about it in the beginning. Most actors are when their children say they want to be in the business, but he convinced me that he had to do it and I have no arguments against that. He is a good actor. He is a wonderful comedy actor.

Q. Screen or stage?

A. Well, his work has mostly been on the stage and that's where I enjoyed him most. He did make one appearance in an episode of Star Trek in a quite famous episode called "Inner Light," one of the best stories ever filmed, in which he played my son.

Q. What's his name?

A. Danny.

Q. Could you talk a bit about your relationship with Shatner contrary to rumors that have been on the media lately?

A. Yeah, that's right. But you know, who wants to write articles about how Patrick Stewart and Bill Shatner get along? Who cares?

Q. I do actually.

A. Alright, then let's talk about it.

Q. I mean you've got so much in common.

A. Yeah, it is extraordinary how much in common we do have.

Q. Was there any trepidation about meeting him?

 

A. Bill has a bit of a brutal reputation that preceeds him, particularly in his relationship with his colleagues and I was uneasy about that. Also, there were stories that Bill had made certain negative remarks about our show in the early days, with him not being supportive. I've got to take that up with him one of these days. But when we finally sat down together, he and I, it was a very productive. We were at the ShoWest convention in Las Vegas late one night and I had an early morning call the next day. The Paramount plane was put at my disposal and Bill said, "Can I get a lift?" So he and I flew back from Las Vegas together in the executive jet, just the two of us alone up in the sky for an hour and it was perfect because it gave us the opportunity to sit down and talk. We didn't talk about career. We certainly didn't talk about Star Trek. We talked about very personal things and it was the foundation to help us to work so well together when the movie began. He has become a good friend.

wpe9.jpg (11219 bytes)

 

BRENT SPINER

(Lt. Commander Data)

 

 

 

Rick Berman

Brent Spiner

David Carson

Malcolm MacDowell

Patrick Stewart

William Shatner

The Questor Tapes

wpe4.jpg (17546 bytes)

Q. So, you clearly had no fun at all.

A. Yeah, really. It was like dying and going to heaven, you know. I had been sort of euphemistically painting on a very narrow pallet for a long time with kind of muted colors, so it was a real opportunity to cut loose. When I first read the script, I was a little concerned about it just because it was so different even though it represented an evolution for the character, but in thinking about it, I finally came to the conclusion that in worse case scenario, they would love me in France.

Q. Where does the character go from here now that it has achieved its goal?

A. I think if I had my way about it -- which I hardly ever have -- to me it seems that the character went from being child-like and naive in the series to being a different kind of child in this one because of the newness of the emotions and the inability to control them and know exactly how to handle them. He was a child with emotion and I think the obvious place to take the character is into a gradual maturity. An emotional maturity and that can only mean romance, can't it? I would hope that that is what would occur -- a deepening or understanding of emotion and the subtleties, and how to deal with that is where it is going to go.

Q. Where he went in the final episode, which of course, is one possibility....I kind of liked the fact that he became somewhat obnoxious.

A. Yeah, me too.

Q. It was somewhat of a logical progression.

A. Yeah, it really was. When I read the final episode, I was thrilled to find that he became a professor at Cambridge and he was holding the same chair now as his old friend Steven Hawkings once did because we are very close, you know. I call him "The Hawk" actually. But, yeah, I thought that was a real logical place for him to go.

Q. How much of Brent Spiner was now in Data?

A. Well, certainly more, although I am not quite that immature emotionally -- close, but yeah, there was more of me in it because I was able to use more of me. Initially, the beauty of a character like Data is that nobody can tell you that you are doing it wrong. There is no sort of standard for how an android behaves. So, I had that luxury for a long time but the movie required me to actually use more of myself.

Q. What do you think is unique about William Shatner and why do you think William Shatner has been so everlasting?

A. You know, I'm not sure I can speak on the uniqueness of the character or Bill -- I call him Bill, to let you know how close we are -- but I think it is more -- and this is just my opinion -- what's the word -- he is the quintessential hero. It's not a uniqueness at all. It may be just the opposite. It is something we all know and recognize and want to be and in sort of mythological terms, he is the hero who goes out in search of something to bring back to his people, which is the essence of all mythology and be it a weapon or intelligence or medicine or whatever, the hero goes out in search. I think Bill had sort of embodied that mythological hero. It's something that we all respond to.

Q. How would you contrast that with Patrick's captain?

A. Patrick's captain -- it is taking that same hero and applying to it civilization and the ability to negotiate rather than use force, and I think Patrick projects just wisdom and intelligence and I think that time has evolved the idea of a captain.

Q. Do you call him Pat?

A. I sometimes do just to irritate him.

Q. Obviously you worked with David Carson on the series -- what's his approach? Has his approach changed at all from doing an episode to doing this multi-million dollar movie?

A. Well, his approach wasn't necessarily different except that he had the luxury of more time. Generally on the series we were shooting between eight and ten pages a day. On the feature we were doing between two and three pages a day. So, that afforded both David and the cast the opportunity to try more and to actually get it right as opposed to just get it. As a director in general -- and I was more aware of it on the film because I actually, in the episodes David has directed, never had that much to do. One episode I had a bit, but I worked with him more on the film than I had prior to that. I found him really, really bright, prepared and whenever I would be at a loss of where to take something, he had a real clear vision on where it should go. I found him enormously helpful and I admired his sort of digging his heels in because as always happens, I think there are time constraints and there are monetary constraints that the studio has to be concerned about. But David made his primary concern, I think, to make a good picture and just basically refused to be budged on that notion.

Q. They wanted him to cut the ocean scene.

A. The boat scene?

Q. The boat scene. He told me that was the first thing they wanted him to cut.

A. Before we started shooting, yeah, but again he would basically just dig his heels in and say, "I don't want to just make a movie, I would like to make a very good movie if possible" and he stuck to that all the way through the final day of shooting.

Q. For you what was the difference between doing the series and the movie?

A. Well, we had much better accommodations for one thing. It really was in the area of getting more takes and being able to just sort of go with an instinct and try it and take things to extremes that we weren't able to do in the series. Generally, in the series if you say your lines right and you hit your mark, that's good enough. Performance really isn't a factor too often and in the feature, we had the opportunity to do more takes and go into a different direction and try this and that. It was just a more creative sort of thing for an actor, which you like to do anyway. That was basically the difference for me and the way the character evolved was different for me as well.

Q. Was a collaborative process going on as the character evolved during the filming in terms of the script? Did you bring anything to it -- as you were saying bringing your own personality and emotions to it, any lines, working with the writers or the director?

A. Yeah. Actually we had a lot more input into the film than we usually did in the series. That again was because of time restraints. On the series, we would be finishing an episode at midnight or 2:00 a.m. and starting another one the next day and barely had time to read it, much less really address the problems that we had. We just had to do it. In this case, I had several meetings with the writers and with Rick and David and was able to give notes on it and make adjustments to it and there was more freedom on the set. I could actually ad lib an odd moment or two, which was rarely done in the series, because again of time and in this case we were able to say, "Sure, you can try one like that."

Q. Do you remember your ad libs?

A. There are a couple. Most of the ab libs for me happened in the laughing sequence. The whole thing with using the tricorder as the puppet and Mr. Tricorder and doing an imitation of Patrick and things like that. I also got to make up the little tune that I did later

wpe2.jpg (7132 bytes)

Q. You made a few major moves in your life. Were those hard decisions to make? Were they difficult times?

A. Well, the move to New York -- I was quite young and I had just got out of college and that was difficult because I came from Texas and I had never heard of Long Johns, for example. I didn't know what they were. I literally thought I was going to die the first year I came to New York just from the cold. I had no idea and I didn't know how people lived here. It was so cold and then somebody told me about those magic things called Long Johns, but, yeah, I came from a suburban neighborhood in Houston, Texas and it couldn't be any more different from living in an urban city, particularly New York City. So, it took me a couple of years of living here before I really adjusted to it and, you know, when that happens it is like suddenly there is no other place on earth to live other than New York, but I was here for eleven years. I did a lot of theatre, did around 25 plays, and became very broke as happens, and figured that I got too old to do what I was doing and I needed to start sort of living my life as an adult and that kind of required actually making an income. So, I went to LA. Actually I went to LA with Little Shop of Horrors.

Q. Now, was that a difficult decision? I mean to grow up?

A. You know, I still haven't committed to it entirely but sure, you know, it was actually because I really enjoyed that sort of Bohemian -- being a struggling artist. That had a very romantic notion to me as a child. I thought that was the way you were supposed to do it and I still kind of believe that. When I came to New York, there was no option really. If one was serious about being an actor, you came to New York and you did theatre and you struggled and that was just part of the deal and there is hardly anything better when you are young, really. It was ideal.

Q. How did you find LA?

A. Well, that was the reward finally. I got to warm up and I was used to a mobile community. Houston is very much like LA. It is sort of like a dress rehearsal for LA. It's probably never going to open, but they are similar towns actually just in terms of what they feel like. It wasn't much of an adjustment really.

Q. A lot of your co-stars were resigned to the fact that they weren't going to have a lot of screen time in this movie. That wasn't a problem with you, but I'm just wondering whether or not -- you know, because you seem to be a pretty close cast, did that put any sort of pressure? Actors are actors.

A. That's true. It was not derisive among us. It really --there was nobody who was upset with anybody else as far as the cast is concerned with the size of our roles. I think those in the picture who have the larger roles -- as you say, actors are actors and even the ones of us who had larger roles didn't feel we had enough. So, no one ever does, you know. So, no, it didn't cause any friction between the cast.

Q. So, what about since the end of filming, did it really hit you that the series is over and have you had much interaction with the rest of the cast?

A. Yeah. We still speak every week, most of us, and we are sort of connected. We really became -- I know this is really boring -- I wish I could give you some dirt here. I really do. If you like, I will make something up, but we got along famously. Making a TV series is hardly adverse conditions, but we were on sound stages in uncomfortable make-up for 15 to 18 hour days, almost every day for seven years and if we didn't hate each other after that, it just was never going to happen. We actually got on very well through the entire run. I can't imagine many jobs better than the one we had for the simple reason that what kind of job is it that you get to go to work every day with your friends and laugh all day long? That's basically what we did and as a result we are still incredibly close. I mean, I had been with Patrick last week. I was best man at LeVar's wedding and so I speak with LeVar all the time and I spoke to Marina last night. We keep in really close contact.

Q. Were you ready to move on? Most of you had signed for an eighth season I understand, and then Paramount decided to forget the show and do the movie. Some of the actors -- and I think Patrick was one of them -- were ready to move on. He said, "We have done this for seven years. I'm done." Are you one of those people who were ready to move on?

A. Yeah. We had done 178 hours. One hundred and seventy eight hours of anything is just about enough, I think. It was a brutal sort of seven years of work and I was glad not to have to get up at 5:00 in the morning any more. I think we were really almost all ready to stop doing it. Maybe a couple of people would have been interested in doing an eighth season, but not many of us really. I think we felt, "Yeah, we have done this now for seven years and with luck, we will get to come back and do it every couple of years."

Q. The movies would still be interesting to you?

A. Yeah, well, again for the reason that I get to come back together with my friends and have some fun. It would be like going to summer camp every couple of years.

Q. Is that the plan for your character, basically to come back in the next movie or perhaps another one? Or any other plans?

A. You know what? I don't know if there are any plans. I think it is sort of an economical factor and I think that is the bottom line on it. If the movie does well, undoubtedly, I think the studio would like to make another one and if it doesn't do well, than we probably won't.

Q. Do you have a favorite scene in the movie?

A. To be completely honest, I haven't seen the whole movie. I just did looping and consequently I only looked at myself. So, at this point in time I am my favorite thing in the movie, but I haven't seen it yet. So, I may change my mind once I have seen it.

Q. What's next?

A. I am just sort of crossing my fingers and hoping for the best because I don't know. Having been associated with a project that I consider a quality project for this length of time, I am reluctant to just jump into anything else. I also feel that I had the good fortune of having a really sweet character to play for a long time and I'm not that eager to do something where I get to say, "This is really me." If I had my choice, it would be another extreme character of some sort, but I think it remains to be seen whether my identification with the role is going to be detrimental in terms of the rest of my career. At the moment, I don't feel particularly any more typecast than say Harpo Marx.

Q. Have casting directors typecast you?

A. Do you know what is interesting, I am finding -- and I think this is true -- that Star Trek is not really an industry show. It is not like, say, NYPD Blue or Seinfeld or something that the industry watches. They are aware of it. They know it is there. I find that when I go in to audition for things now, people don't actually know who I am and I see that as a benefit, actually. You know, that they don't have a perceived notion of who I am.

Q. Can you talk a little bit about your makeup and also your eyes in this film in terms of what it required and what it is all about?

A. Basically, it is gold powder that is put on about three inches deep and yellow contacts and I think, what I have seen of the film, is for the first time that it actually looks gold. People are who watch the series ask me, "Now, are you white or are you green?" and I was neither. I think depending on the quality of the television set -- but it was always gold and in person when people would meet me on the set, they would always be startled by the color of it because it was not what they were used to seeing. Then again, that is part of the time constraint of a series. They were not able to light specifically for the color of my skin and John Alonzo who shot the picture is a master -- beautiful -- I mean he is a master. The first day that he saw me he went, "You're gold!"

Q. Was the crying scene difficult to do? Did they have to redo it a couple of times to get it the right way?

A. You know, I think we did it once, actually. Yeah. It was kind of like motor oil.

Q. With all that makeup on, wasn't it difficult as far as your skin? Uncomfortable?

A. It was not particularly uncomfortable and it didn't really cause problems with my skin because Paramount was kind enough to finance a facial for me every other weekend for fear that I would look like a teenager on screen. The only thing that was really difficult was the contacts. They were ordinary soft contact lenses -- prescription contact lenses -- they weren't my prescription, but they were prescription. The only real difficulty was that the makeup would get into my eyes and kind of smear over the contacts, so I couldn't really see very well about midway through the day. But that was all that was difficult.

Q. You guys were always notoriously playing practical jokes on one another. Who was the most abusive cast member?

A. But you know what? Oddly, we weren't really practical jokers. I had heard that before. I mean nobody put like buckets of water over the doors or anything. It was nothing like that. We were sort of -- I actually think it was a cast of comedians and truly everyone was funny, and it was like a big night club act that would go on all day long and only be interrupted by having to do scenes from the show. So, I think -- it was just again being inside 18 hours a day on sound stage. It necessitated levity and it was abundant.

Q. What about guest shots on either Deep Space Nine or Voyager. Would you rule those out for the first year or --

A. I wouldn't rule them out, but I might be more interested in doing them if I could play something else.

Q. Has it been talked about?

A. No. Well, other than just now?

Q. I'll talk to Rick for you.

A. Would you? I'm not particularly eager to do that. Not because of any negative feeling about those shows. It is just, again, I have done 178 hours of Star Trek television and if they desperately needed me, certainly I would come on and do it but I don't think that is the case and I don't desperately need to do that. I'm more interested right now in doing other things.

Q. Do you watch Deep Space?

A. No, but I didn't watch our show either. I watched the first two years of it and that was around 50 episodes and I thought, that's enough.

Q. Deep Space Nine?

A. Of our show. I got it. I enjoyed it. I figured actually that for the rest of my life it is going to be in re-runs and some day I am going to be in a hotel room in Shaboygen and I'm going to turn on the television and I would rather it be an episode that I hadn't seen before. So, I thought I am going to save five years of this for later.

Q. I was reading through Entertainment Weekly and it talked about an album you have out or coming out?

A. Well, it is already out actually. It has been out a couple of years.

Q. Do you plan on doing any more?

A. Yeah. I would like to do another album. I'm waiting until I'm really ready to lose a whole lot more money, because it was a total vanity production. and Wendy Nuss, who is one of the producers on the series, produced it. Dennis McCarthy did the arrangements for it. The guys on the show sang backup on one number with me and it was just something we wanted to do and we did and actually it is something that I am very proud of. I think it came out exactly as we wanted it to.

Q. What's it called?

A. It is called "Oh, Yellow Eyes is Back."

Q. Have the Sunspots sang anything?

A. The sunspots have not sung together, but I'm sure independently they have. That's what my backup group is called -- The Sunspots.

Q. Brent, are you married? Do you have children?

A. No, I'm not and I don't.

Q. How old are you?

A. Let me think? Do you know what, let me just say this, when I turned 39, I realized what a genius Jack Benny really was.

Q. Are you into computers and technology and all that stuff? I mean, how did you get the technobabble?

A. Well, only because I'm an actor. I memorized it, exactly. I mean, the role actually required more memorization than anything else on the show. I think most actors would say this, but they like not to learn their lines, not to have them down pat when they come in, that it is through the rehearsal process and so on, but that was impossible with this because I was saying things that my mouth had never said before and it really was a matter of muscle learning. You couldn't just learn the lines in your head. They actually had to be spoken out loud before you got there or you were going to be in big trouble and we found that often with our guest stars who were unused to it. Their process was what they usually brought to something and this required a different sort of homework, but in general I am not particularly a technical person. I do have a computer but I am certainly not literate with it and often I hadn't a clue of what I was talking about. I really didn't. I found out, but I had no idea what it meant. The fans of the show understand it much better than I did.

Q. Didn't the series provide you with some interesting acting opportunities?

A. That's true. Initially my fear was when I got the part, that it was going to be a very limited part to play and it was anything but that. I wound up being -- not only did the character have an arc in which he grew through the seven years towards humanity and understanding the subtleties and idiosyncracies of what it means to be a human, I also got to play a lot of other characters. Data trying on different forms of humanity like Sherlock Holmes and things like that. Then I also got to play my brother and my father at different ages and there are episodes where I would play four or five characters. It couldn't be a better part than that.

Q. And that part is very rare where a character can progress that subtly.

A. It truly is. I remember in the very beginning I had a meeting with Gene Roddenberry where we discussed where we wanted the character to go, both of us, and his notion, and I quite agreed with him, was the journey that my character would be on if the show progressed that far, was that with each passing year he would get closer and closer to humanity and finally would be extremely close but still not a human and I think that was the way it went and I think it is still going that way. I was delighted that in the film that it didn't just stop, that we actually had some movement in the character.

Q. How did you get the role?

A. I auditioned just like --

Q. Were there lots and lots of people?

A. There were quite a few people and finally it came down to me and one other guy and fortunately I think Tom Cruise decided he wanted to do films, so it fell to me.

Q. Who is the movie going to appeal to? Is it just going to be Star Trekkers or does it have more of a universal appeal?

A. I don't know. I hope it has a more universal appeal. I think if it is just an entertaining picture in general, I think it appeals to everybody. Certainly the Trekker has more insight into the subtleties of it, but I think it is just a cracking good action adventure movie. Hopefully that will appeal to a lot of people.

 

MALCOLM MCDOWELL

(Dr. Tolian Soran)

 

Rick Berman

Brent Spiner

David Carson

Malcolm MacDowell

Patrick Stewart

William Shatner

The Questor Tapes

wpeE.jpg (10556 bytes)

 

Q. Malcolm, I thought it was just hilarious that here are two RSC guys duking it out in the California dessert.

A. Right.

Q. When you were at RSC, did you ever have any idea of the success you would achieve?

A. Oh, I had a total premonition. No, of course not.

Q. What was your dream?

A. Certainly it wasn't to be duking it out with Patrick Stewart on top of some bloody mountain in the Valley of Fire, that's for sure, but I don't know. It is strange the way life comes into full circle, isn't it? So, I worked with Patrick when I was very young. He was somewhat younger. Although he looked just the same -- bald. I always rather envied him in those days because he could play any part, you know, any age. He could play old men and did when he was in his twenties. I think he used to have this piece that he used to pop on for auditions but I think he was always more successful with the bald look.

Q. And you worked with him in which production or show?

A. I worked with him when I was on Stratford Upon Avon and I was there in 1965. Productions we did were Henry IV Part I, Part II. They were good sleeping pills. Henry V and various other productions and Patrick was a member of that company and so was I, but there were 100 actors in that company so it wasn't like we were buddies together. We weren't, but we knew each other and got on quite well.

Q. When you were that kid, in having a dream that most actors have, how was the reality different from the dream?

 

A. Well, my dream pretty much came true and I'm sure his did because soon after I left the Royal Shakespeare Company....I hated it by the way. I loathed it. I thought it was like working for the damn government. It was no different. All the political crap that went on.

Q. And you had to do all those plays.

 

A That was the only good part about it. It was just horrendous. I mean they rehearsed, the wastage, the boredom of it. I hated it. Obviously Patrick liked it. He was there for 12 years. I thought they should all get a medal for that.

Q. How long were you there?

A. One year. That was enough for me. It was like being sentenced to Sing-Sing.

Q. How did you leave the RSC?

 

A. When I left the Royal Shakespeare Company I remember saying to Peter Hall, who ran the company -- you have to go meet with him at the end of season and he would give you your marching orders or tell you what exciting things lay in prospect for you. So, six of us met in the pub, The Dirty Duck, and we were young revolutionaries if you like and troublemakers, agitators, you know, and we would say -- I remember saying things like "This is all crap. I'm going in there. I'm going to tell this guy to stick this damn company -- I feel like I am here just to move furniture," because that is basically what the young actors do. They come in, they bring on the crown or throne and then the actor comes in and sits on it and you stand by it and then you take the damn thing off. That is what drove me nuts. Now, there were six of us, I remember saying, "We're going in there. We are going to tell this guy where to stick this damn company" and, of course, I was the first in and I did tell him, "There is no way. I don't care what you had in mind for me. I'm out of here. I'm gone. I'm history" and I'm going off. He said, "What are you going to do?" I said, "I'm going to be a movie star." Ha, ha, ha. Laugh, laugh, laugh. So, I'm waiting for the other five to come back to The Dirty Duck and they come in eventually and I said, "You told him?" "Well, he offered me the third duke from the right and you know, I think it could be a great part." "Twelve lines!" "Well, there are ways I could put a lot of emotion in --" I was the only one. I talked myself out of a job. But there you are. You take your chance and within, I think, a year I was starring in my first movie. So, I was very lucky.

Q. Have there been many ups and downs?

A. There have been so many. I think careers go up and down, up and down, up and down. I think what I have learned is in the down time when nobody seems to want you and you are in cold storage, you learned how to use that time productively and not get down on yourself. You have to be philosophical about it and you know it is a cross -- from an actor's point of view, this profession is one of rejection. I don't even care if you are Tom Cruise. I mean, Anne Rice rejected him. Didn't want him. I don't care who you are, there is always that element of rejection and, of course, you have to have thick skin about it. I used to say, "Oh, well, they didn't want me to do that part. They are the losers, not me." But, of course, you know, that was a way of getting through it.

wpeF.jpg (8494 bytes)

Q. But what do you do?

A. Oh, you get on with another life -- you have another life. You have a family and another life entirely and I think that is important. The work is only the work, but the real life is what is really important.

Q. Did you dislike Shakespeare or was it just the RSC?

A. I think more the RSC. I think I am not a very good company member. That's why I could never do what Shatner and Stewart have done. I could never be a company man for seven years in the same part. It would drive me insane.

Q. How do you feel about becoming part of the Star Trek phenomenon?

A. I'm not going to be part of it. I'm onto the next thing already and that's it.

Q. What is next?

A. Well, I finished a movie called Tank Girl, which was a cartoon in Europe which is kind of a fun piece. So, it is a big budget thing for UA. We'll see how that goes.

Q. How did this come about actually? When you were first approached -- when you heard Star Trek, what went through your mind?

A. Well, I had an open mind about it because, you know, I don't think I would do the series on television just because it doesn't appeal to me very much. I read the script and although I didn't really understand the script, I couldn't understand a word of it with all that Nexus stuff. I didn't know what the hell they were talking about but I thought there was a glimmer of a part there. A glimmer of some things that could be fun. So, they asked for a meeting and I went into a meeting with them and they asked me to read for it. I said, "No, I won't." It was ridiculous. What do they think it is, Shakespeare? So, I wouldn't read it but I had a very good meeting with Rick Berman and David Carson, and I think we got to talking about Patrick Stewart in the old days and there was a tape on. I hope he never sees this, but I think they said something about how old Patrick Stewart was and, of course, I knew how old but I am not going to tell today, but when they said at this meeting how old he was, I said "Yeah, that's right." So, we just had a bit of a laugh. Anyway, Rick Berman told me it was a very, very funny tape. So, I closed the door on the way out and they knew they wanted me to play the part.

Q. So, did you have fun?

A. Yes, I did. It was great because working with Patrick was fun for me because I knew him all those years ago and I have bumped into him at various times through our lives and I always liked Patrick, you know. What's not to like? He's a nice guy and I didn't really know what to expect when I worked with Bill Shatner, but he was a gentleman -- very professional. We had all these fights and then we went back and shot the damn thing. It was a never ending ending.

Q. I understand you were the one who announced you were killing Kirk.

A. Yes, I was.

Q. You let the word out early.

A. Probably. Somebody asked me and I told them. And then I said, "Oh, did I do something wrong. Nobody told me not to say anything." They said, "No, it's okay." Well, yes, I shot him in the back originally and then I think they wanted him to have more of a heroic death. So, he fell off a bridge that I blew up. I suppose I would be held up on manslaughter rather than murder in the first. So, I think I am responsible for his death. It is just that I wasn't there to actually tread on his fingers and let him drop down that 200 foot cliff -- but if they had asked me, I would have been there like a shot.

Q. Malcolm, when Hollywood casts villains, why do they always cast the English actors?

A. I think you should address that question to these idiots out there. I don't know. The English make good villains for some reason. Going back --way back. I remember talking to James Mason about that. I said, "Oh, you will be in that villain category and that will be it." But he had a very busy career. I don't mind -- I love playing villains. I must say that it is nice to change occasionally, but I always have fun playing villains and I never take it too seriously, of course. I think villains are always the most interesting parts, usually, and what I like particularly about playing the villain is you don't have to be in every day. So, it's lovely. You don't have to carry the piece. The shoe leather as I call it. Being there for every shot. You just come in and steal the scenes that you are in and then you are on to the next.

Q. Do you think this movie will make more younger people aware of who you are?

A. Who knows? It depends on, I suppose, whether it is successful or not. If it is successful, I suppose it will, but I quite like the place that I am in. I rather like having people that know me because they have had to work at it a bit. I don't like to be too accessible through a TV show or something like that. It's much nicer and better where I am.

Q. Do you think people still remember you from a lot of the earlier movies?

A. Some do. Some do and then it is nice. They were wonderful films and I'm very, very happy that I did them, but life moves on. You can't dwell on the past.

Q. Have you ever considered -- I'm sure you must have -- how Clockwork Orange nowadays is almost like a documentary?

A. Yes, it is indeed. Well, of course, it is a brilliant film anyway. It is not so violent. I remember when it came out, I was actually shocked at the way the Americans particularly jumped on this whole thing of the violence of Clockwork Orange. I thought if they ever read the book, they would realize how much it was tamed down. Don't they ever read the newspapers? The violence is out in the street, you know. I think it is sort of an extraordinary message. Really, the film to me is not about the violence although, of course, that is very much a part of it, but it is really about the freedom of a man to choose what he wants to do and I think a sacred right of a human being is choice.

Q. Wasn't that banned in Britain?

A. It wasn't banned in Britain. There seems to be some confusion because Stanley Kubrick had the power to stop the film from being shown in Britain. I think he is rather paranoid about any gangs coming around and whacking him on the head or something. I don't know what his reason is for it, but I know it is not censorship. It is more Stanley. I think he is very paranoid about it. Maybe he's right. I don't know. I don't live in England any more.

Q. Was Soran a particularly physical role for you?

A. It was. It is not running the mile or anything or a marathon, but it was a fun role. I mean there is no question about it, I really enjoyed it. I enjoyed finding the character because it really wasn't on the page of the script. I really in my mind have this idea that this man was like a drug addict -- had to get a fix and he wouldn't let anything divert him from that one goal. He was a very concentrated man. I really liked Soran as a character. I don't think he is a bad man at all. I've played much meaner. He is not a mean character. He has no malice really. Yes, he was going to destroy a planet with 230 million souls or whatever. But....you know.

Q. I understand you really enjoyed the scenes with the Klingons.

A. I loved those Klingons. Oh, those girls. They are just party girls, you know. Especially when they got their teeth out. But, of course, when I walked -- when I came into a room and there they were, I would never recognize them in years. Boy, they were pretty well endowedm, let's put it that way. That is about all I was looking at the whole time. It is like working with two Patrick Stewarts.

Q. Christmas is coming. What was your most memorable Christmas?

A. Oh, my God. My most memorable Christmas? Oh, I think when I was a child. Of course, Christmas is for children really. Now, it is pretty ghastly. I think I remember it most as a child -- opening the presents and being with the family.

Q. Where?

A. For me it was in Liverpool in England.

Q. Were you poor? Were you rich?

A. Middle class. Suffering middle class. It was just the same then as it is now. Although we weren't rich by any means, we never really suffered. We always did quite well.

Q. Didn't you narrate the documentary, The Compleat Beatles.

A. Yes, I did.

Q. Was there any reason? I didn't realize the Liverpool background.

A. Paul McCartney asked me to do it.

Q. Did he really?

A. He didn't ask me personally but I was on a Concord flight with him and Linda and it was soon after that I got a call saying would I do it. I said I would like to see it before I did it and I saw it and it was a brilliant film. Of course the Beatles are very much a part of my history, because one went in tandem with Beatles because they opened it up for the people of Northern England and they made it easier for me to be an actor, really. For sure. I have always been very fond of them. I veer more towards John Lennon probably than Paul McCartney. That's probably just the way I become think. Although one could admire Paul McCartney, I think the real heart of the group was John Lennon. But, of course, without either of them, they would never have been anything -- because they were so competitive and I think that Paul McCartney was so brilliant for John because he would come up with all these great tunes and then John would have to try and top him, and he was so lazy of course. Because if it hadn't been for McCartney, I don't think Lennon would ever have written anything, hardly. You know, it's true.

Q. Of course, you have to throw George Martin in there somewhere too.

A. Well, George Martin just mixed a good sound and just produced it. What has George Martin done since? The real true greatness is really those two -- although the four of them actually. The way they came together was a whole era really. It was more than just four provincial lads. The stuff that they wrote really in retrospect is staggering. We are talking in terms of the greatest composers of this century -- up there with them -- the Gershwins and all that. They can hold their own with any of them. But I do believe it was all to do with uping one on each other and competition between them.

 

WILLIAM SHATNER

(Captain James T. Kirk)

 

 

Rick Berman

Brent Spiner

David Carson

Malcolm MacDowell

Patrick Stewart

William Shatner

The Questor Tapes

wpeB.jpg (10321 bytes)

Q. In your book, Star Trek Movie Memories, you make a big point of how difficult it was to gear up to play the death scene of Kirk. Then you had to go back and do it again. Was it easier the second time around?

A. There are people in history who have died more than once --who have been resurrected and died again.

Q. I've heard that.

A. I'll play it straight. It took me some time to think about how I wanted to play the scene and to play it as honestly as I could. It required some self-examination -- all that kind of thing. I could go into more detail, but I'll shorthand it. So, it was very emotional for me that first time we did it. And then, six weeks later when I was up in Toronto doing TekWar I got a call from the producer saying we have to go back and shoot it again. Malcolm's reaction, Patrick's reaction and my reaction apparently was the same. Was it my performance? And they said, "No." Somehow everybody lost sight of the fact that I was being shot in the back and it kind of slipped away -- the whole ending kind of slipped away. They wanted more action and they were going to change the shot in the back, but the dialogue remained the same. So, yes, I had to go back and die again, but by this time I had worked out the performance, so I didn't need to look at it with the clarity of what's it like to die and what am I going to be like when I die and how frightened I am of dying and what would Captain Kirk do when he crosses that threshold. I had already done that. So, the second time I knew the performance. I had opened already.

Q. Even though you did die, you are not necessarily dead or at least -- or are you necessarily dead. I mean, logic would suggest that anything is possible. Is he really dead. Is the character out of the --

A. Well, I understand the nature of your question having fooled you a couple of times before -- not fooled you, but just people said, "Well, the movie made money, maybe we better bring you back to life" and stuff like that because we certainly meant it at the time, but in this case, there is a whole different cast and they want their time and place in the sun and our cast is -- It would be impossible to bring the two casts together. We are separated by time and there is no logic in this in the way the story works.

Q. When did logic have that much to do with it?

A. When did logic have that much to do with it? Well, there is an internal logic. A theatrical logic.

Q. Bill, are you a workaholic?

A. Am I a workaholic?

Q. In your lifetime you have done more things than any of us could ever dream of ever doing.

A. From my point of view, I'm grasping opportunities because you never know when it all might stop. No, I don't think of myself as a workaholic, although I heard the word attached to me this year. As you see, I have Star Trek Movie Memories and TekPower and TekWars, which debuts January 7th on the USA Network, and CBS has Rescue 911, the miracle show that saved 300 lives and there is a special on CBS in November -- the end of November. Then there is a conference call. Patrick Stewart and I are on a conference call with 4,000 other people. It has never been done before. It is a unique event.

Q. When is that?

A. December 11th at 6:00 in this time zone 4,000 people will be on the phone with Patrick Stewart and me. Then in the Central and Pacific time zones it will be repeated. So there will be a total of 12,000 people that will be either talking to Patrick Stewart or me. An operator will randomly select the people to ask the questions. It has never been done before. It is a unique telephone event.

Q. How do they do that?

A. By buying a card which would become a collectible and again in shorthand 1-800-TEC-TREK will give you all the information. So, I am enumerating the things I am involved with right now. There are many other things that are further down the line.

Q. Radio and television? What are you talking about?

A. I'm talking about picking up the telephone and dialing a PIN number -- Personal Identification Number. You become part of 4,000 people all on the line at the same time. Is that astonishing to you?

Q. It's out of Star Trek.

A. It's out of Star Trek. Four thousand people will all be communicating at the same time. Now, they won't be able to speak all at the same time but they will all be listening to the hems and the haw. It will be live. We will be talking to you on the phone except all of us there and times a hundred -- I mean, it is astonishing. That is what's happening. So, when something like that occurs to me it is not "I've got to keep working. I've got to keep working." To me, it's "My God!" In Toronto, there is a firm called CORE -- it is a special effects house -- that asked me when they formed their company, to be part of the company. I'm working in special